Hi! Alle 16:18, mercoled? 28 settembre 2005, Mark Knecht ha scritto: > I believe that you are using anticipatory. I don't know which one is > best for low latency. > > You can try each one (I think) by adding a boot time option to grub.conf > > elevator=deadline > > or > > elevator=cfq > > for example. > > I've been interested in this also, but not enough to try and develop a > real test. I suspect you'll have to run for a while to make a real > determination. I read at http://www.jacklab.net/index.php?option=com_content&task=blogcategory&id=236&Itemid=221&lang=en_EN that you should use the Realtime Preemption Patch and then enable it. I'm running a 2.6.12 kernel patched with this and using also the realtime-lsm module. But now I'm confused, because 1) "less /sys/block/hda/queue/scheduler" gives me "noop [anticipatory] deadline cfq", so where is the realtime preemption? Is it useful since you do not even mention it? 2)I discovered that the rlimits way it's better: is it true? Is it also simpler than loading the realtime module, which I can do in a straightforward way? Byez! Carotinho ___________________________________ Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi e allegati da 10MB http://mail.yahoo.it
