On Mon, 2005-09-12 at 11:32 -0400, Paul Davis wrote: > > Bouncing a final mix to 1/2 inch tape before the final print allows you > > to do the 44.1 conversion from a high quality analog source. But, it > > assumes that the source recordings and processing was done at an > > extremely high level - i.e. DSD. And unfortunately, we don't yet have > > any open-source tools for manipulating DSD. I know of a few mastering > > houses that would *kill* to be using GNU/Linux if the tools were > > available. > > there is a still quite a lot of controversy over whether or not Sony's 1 > bit/MHz clock design actually *is* better than more "traditional" > approaches. i know there is a lot of good marketing to explain why its > so cool, but that doesn't seem to be backed up by any substantive double > blind testing. even the math analysis is heavy on marketing bullshit. Hmm - I didn't know that. I'm no DSD expert, but I understand that there are some clear drawbacks. For example, the DSD process introduces high levels of ultrasonic noise which can cause problems with certain playback equipment, and it is very troublesome to attempt DSP with pure DSD signals. But if you're trying to accurately capture a "real-world" performance - it certainly is a strong contender. Cutting edge technology formats often attract controversy for many reasons. That said, many of the (admittedly few) facilities that specialize in audiophile authoring (both SACD and DVD-A) rely on DSD basic capture and editing tools. Speaking as a format agnostic, I think it would be tough to argue that it doesn't sound damn good. Greg www.steeprockmedia.com
