On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 10:50:53AM +0100, studio-64 wrote: > Lee Revell wrote: > >On Tue, 2005-09-06 at 20:51 -0400, Paul Davis wrote: > >>On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 01:36 +0200, Michael Rudolf wrote: > >>>I bought an RME Digi96/8 PST because it was said to have good Linux > >>>support and very low latency, therefore perfectly suitable for > >>>hd-recording and the like. > >>where does it say this? the digi96/8 is an entirely different product > >>(different h/w design, different chipset, different interactions with > >>the host CPU) from the digi9652, HDSP and HDSP9652 systems. this latter > >>range is well supported and works exceedingly well on almost all > >>systems. the digi96/8 has support, but it does not work particularly > >>well, especially not for low latency work (this is not because of the > >>driver design (other than the overall way that ALSA works), but because > >>of the h/w design). We have a boatload of RME Digi96/8 PADs here at RFA. We're starting to use them in linux boxes. I'm not sure what exactly the differences between the PSTs and PADs are, but so far it appears the PAD supports only 1024 x 2 or 256 x 2. At least, those are the only two combinations I can start jack with when using one of these cards. -- Eric Dantan Rzewnicki | Systems Administrator Technical Operations Division | Radio Free Asia 2025 M Street, NW | Washington, DC 20036 | 202-530-4900 CONFIDENTIAL COMMUNICATION This e-mail message is intended only for the use of the addressee and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. Any unauthorized dissemination, distribution, or copying is strictly prohibited. If you receive this transmission in error, please contact network@xxxxxxxx
