On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 09:50:39PM -0400, Lee Revell wrote: > On Fri, 2005-09-02 at 10:16 +1000, Ryan Heise wrote: > > I recall you said once that installing 2.6.13 is a "terribly bad idea" > > if you want a stable machine. You also mentioned that 2.6.12 was quite > > stable. > That was in reference to 2.6.13 + the -rt patches, which are highly > experimental, not 2.6.13 vanilla. > > Do you now recommend 2.6.13 or 2.6.12? What is the "debian way" to > > install 2.6.13? Is there a package? > Same way you installed 2.6.11 just use the 2.6.13 package. If there's > no debian kernel source package for 2.6.13 yet then just install it the > old fashioned way - build it then and make install. Or, configure it, make-kpkg kernel_image dpkg -i <kernel_image>.deb -- Eric Dantan Rzewnicki | Systems Administrator Technical Operations Division | Radio Free Asia 2025 M Street, NW | Washington, DC 20036 | 202-530-4900 CONFIDENTIAL COMMUNICATION This e-mail message is intended only for the use of the addressee and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. Any unauthorized dissemination, distribution, or copying is strictly prohibited. If you receive this transmission in error, please contact network@xxxxxxxx
