Hi My system dual boots Linux/Windows. I have software I could not afford on the Linux part of my box & muse / rosegarden actually sound audibly better (IMHO) than my modest copy of Cubasis. I have not figured out how to recompile my Windows kernel for low latency (snigger) & when I use midi yoke for soft synths the latency is unworkable, unlike Linux & Jack. I have also made a 'live' music production disk using Slackware & Linux Live & have yet to figure out how to do that on Windows (snigger snigger). I have to dual boot because of specialist software in another area I use, but for music I use Linux: for someone in my situation there is no contest. Regards Guy studio-64 wrote: > Hi I'm sure some on here can think of a few comments to add to this: > Linux v Windoze debate. > > I note two revealing comments. > > "if a subject of the study (vendor for example) is behind its funding, > whether directly (as in this study)" > > and > > "it's important to recognize the small sample size in drawing any > conclusions from the data." > > > Would it not be better for the guy to not agreee to do the study? > > http://interviews.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/11/28/1245256 > > > I also note there is no debate as regards DAW's and other more niche > systems. > > My systems would be impossible for me to fund on anything else apart > from Linux. > > > Cheers > Bob > > > > > Bearmusic > hearmymusic.co.uk <http:www.hearmymusic.co.uk> > > > > -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.10/189 - Release Date: 30/11/2005 ___________________________________________________________ To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! Security Centre. http://uk.security.yahoo.com
