On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 09:09:23 +0000 james@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > On Fri, 25 Nov, 2005 at 12:34AM -0800, Kjetil S. Matheussen spake thus: > > > > http://www.notam02.no/arkiv/src/ > > > > I normally use timemachine for recording like this - how does this > differ? > > Oh, and the one thing that timemachine always annoys me with is it's > aparrent inability to write files that can be read by anything except > audacity. Does this do better? Which can be remedied by reading the timemachine documentation (SCNR): ----snip ~$ timemachine -h Usage timemachine: [-h] [-i] [-c channels] [-n jack-name] [-t buffer-length] [-p file prefix] [-f format] [port-name ...] -h show this help -i interactive mode (console instead of X11) also enabled if DISPLAY is unset -c specify number of recording channels -n specify the JACK name timemachine will use -t specify the pre-recording buffer length -p specify the saved file prefix, may include path -f specify the saved file format channels must be in the range 1-8, default 2 jack-name, default "TimeMachine" file-prefix, default "tm-" buffer-length, default 10 secs format, default 'w64', options: wav, w64 specifying port names to connect to on the command line overrides -c ---- snap Flo -- Palimm Palimm! http://tapas.affenbande.org
