Pete Leigh wrote: >On 18/11/05, Clemens Ladisch <clemens@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >>USB 2.0 uses 8000 microframes per second, but EHCI don't interrupt more often >>than once per millisecond by default, so it doesn't make a difference. >> >> > > > So latency doesn't improve over USB 2.0? That's interesting. Thanks. c. >[and much other useful and clear information] > >Thanks, Clemens! I think I might just take my chances on the UR-80, so >make sure your "please show the lsusb -v output for this device" keyboard >macro is up and running ;-) > >Seriously, thanks for your input - much appreciated. > >- Pete. > > > > >
