> > Steve, there is actually a glitch in time when you main bypass. > > Could that be changed to the non-glitching behaviour of bypassing > > the limiter? > > That glitch is just the change in amplitude (I think, at least with > the CVS version), its much less serious than the glitch you get from > changing the latency suddenly. > > - Steve Steve, it's a glitch in _time_, it's clearly audible (CVS from just now). To nail it down I did jack_metro -b 120 -> jamin -> ardour (set tempo to 120) and recorded a track of it, like 4 beats non-bypassed, 4 beats bypassed ... Visually aligned the non-bypassed beats with Ardour's beatlines. It's clearly visible too: The bypassed beats are ~1800 frames early. So, this is no drama, really. But you say there should be no such thing and that we cannot have, now can we :? Wolfgang
