On Tuesday 29 March 2005 18:23, Jan Depner wrote: > On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 09:40, Arnold Krille wrote: > > And even with 10ms delay, why shouldn't it be used for PA? If every > > signal goes thru Jamin no one will notice the delay since (on big enough > > events) no one will hear an original signal. And the musicians on stage > > only get their non-delayed, non-jamined monitor mix and perhaps some > > reflections from the buildungs (which are delayed with or without jamin > > in use)... > If you bypass the limiter you could avoid the delay. I'm just so > used to using the limiter that I never think about turning it off. Hehe, until now I never had the problem to limit my live-mixes. Normally there is more need to push the highs on quiet passages or compressing the voices to equalize head-movement on the lavalier-mics. And to bring the volumes of speach and music more in line... Seems as I will test Jamin on my next live-mix. ;-) Arnold -- There is a theory which states that if ever anyone discovers exactly what the Universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarre and inexplicable. There is another theory which states that this has already happened. -- Douglas Adams, The Restaurant at the End of the Universe -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 190 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://music.columbia.edu/pipermail/linux-audio-user/attachments/20050329/f6b9705d/attachment.bin
