Jack O'Quin wrote: > A recent, stable 2.6.x kernel is also an easy option. I'm getting as > good or better LL results with vanilla 2.6.10 than with 2.4.19 and the > LL patches. I have not tried 2.6.11 yet, but expect it to be even > better. I just upgraded from 2.6.9 to 2.6.11 (both vanilla) and the occational pop is gone. That leaves me with 5.8ms of latency, which is acceptable for now. If I get a need-for-speed or get into trouble I'll get back. Thanks for the pointers. BTW: My 2.6.11 .config is here: http://atte.dk/linux/.config -- peace, love & harmony Atte http://www.atte.dk
