Atte Andr? Jensen wrote: > Hi > > I finally decided to see how well a low latency kernel will work on my > system. I guess the best performance will be with 2.4.x, right? > > Anyways, if someone could point me to some detailed information (pref. > a easy-to-follow how-to) on how to patch (which patches to get from > where) a 2.4 kernel for best possible low latency performance. > > Thanks in advance. > You could try the 2.4.26.ll kernel from CCRMA, it's already patched and works good. It's available here: http://ccrma.stanford.edu/planetccrma/software/system.html#kernel Rick B