On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 09:04:02AM -0500, Joe Hartley wrote: > On Tue, 01 Mar 2005 11:02:31 +0100 > Mario Lang <mlang@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Yes, it is, and I consider this behaviour the only sensible. > > For me, the other dials (those that wrap) are broken, and > > they are a serious accessibility hassle. > > I'm with Mario on this. The last thing I'd want to have happen is to > have a parameter wrap from full off to full on because the controller > sent out a value of 3..2..1..0..127. > I think I would prefer the dial to send relative information as to what direction it's turning, so that you can have more than 127 different values controlled by one knob. It's not exceedingly difficult to take a wrapping controller and make it functionally the same, but if the encoder just stops at 0 and 127, it makes that impossible. I do agree, though, that the wrapping doesn't seem like a very good idea. -spencer
