En/na Dave Phillips ha escrit: > MarC wrote: > >> Today I wouldn't recommend hobbyists to use Linux Audio because in >> this way they will always be hobbyists... > > > Actually, hobbyists will always be hobbyists until they acquire > professional levels of skill *and* put themselves to the test of > performance and/or distribution of their material. The gear they use > will not elevate their skills one jot. Owning a guitar does not confer > ability upon the owner. but chosing the right guitar for your music is very important... I don't think you *must* (it's always good) be very skillful to produce good music, specially with modern tools. The ideas + the final sound are more important and a good tool may help you to make them reality *more fast*. and well, I must say I am a hobbyist musician so I admit I may be totally wrong... > > I will say this about modern music technology, regardless of platform: > It makes a lot of bad music sound much better at the surface level. > >> However, in my case, I've found Linux Audio very interesting to learn >> a lot about the audio software implementation (obviously because of >> the open source mentality) and also for understanding what kind of >> things can be done (for a user/developper point of view). But for >> productive work I simply can't recommend it because Pro Tools, >> Reason,..., and a huge availability of VST plugins are too far from us. > > > Strange, I use VST plugins with Linux quite a lot here at Studio Dave. > Ardour seems to work pretty well for me too, and its price point is > more attractive to me. ;) Good but it could be better (in other platforms is better). > > > Best is to use what works for you to make your own music. I completely agree. > > > You can also thank whatever gods you believe in that M$ didn't make > the WAV format as proprietary as the DOC format... > > Best, > > dp >
