On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 07:04:20AM +1200, Chris Bannister wrote: > On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 01:57:40PM -0400, Lee Revell wrote: > > On Fri, 2005-06-24 at 04:30 +1200, Chris Bannister wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 11:47:16AM -0400, Lee Revell wrote: > > > > Didn't Sarge ship with the horrible NPTL 0.60 bug? > > > > > > > > That should be reason enough to use Ubuntu, Debian does not seem to mind > > > > shipping completely non-working packages. > > > > > > Did you file a bug? > > > > > > > Yes: > > > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=266507 > > > > It's been marked "fixed upstream" since February. > > It's been marked "fixed upstream", but still not fixed? > Pester them. Refile it. It's archived in the BTS so hopefully 'shoddy' > maintainers will get noticed. Sorry to reply to my own post, but the fix seems to be: <quote> --- nptl/pthread_create.c~ 2003-09-09 03:17:15.000000000 -0400 +++ nptl/pthread_create.c 2004-08-17 21:48:47.000000000 -0400 @@ -399,7 +399,7 @@ /* Determine scheduling parameters for the thread. XXX How to determine whether scheduling handling is needed? */ - if (0 && attr != NULL) + if (attr != NULL) { if (iattr->flags & ATTR_FLAG_NOTINHERITSCHED) { Please apply. </quote> Is that for libc6 or the 2.6 kernel? -- Chris. ======
