> In the article I clarify the position that feature-wise, audio > production on Linux is pretty good. Many of the issues that I was > discussing were that some pre-requisite knowledge is required before > you can get started. It seems that to record on Linux you need to have > trawled through documentation, the archives for this list and read up > on the intracies of getting the different parts of the system working. > To me, this seems like a flaw in the offering - surely the user should > be able to get up and running straight away - they download their > package of choice, install and run. Would this not be better? > - do you feel there is a seperation between a professional and an > amateur? So, the software would 'just work' for the amateur, but the > professional should really know the specifics of the system and how to > set it up. What you are looking for then is a simple program that just about anyone get figure out and doesn't require a bunch of interdependant programs to work right. Something simple that may not be exactly best for someone with more experience. You are looking for a program called Audacity.
