On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 06:42:29PM +0200, Christoph Eckert wrote: > > I've just joined the list and it's pretty interesting. > > Can someone tell me something about the differences between > > the preempt patch from Ingo and the "Realtime Linux > > Security Module"? I currently use the latter one and I'm > > quite satisfied as jack works really fast. Perhaps one > > should try this way instead of the vanilla kernel patch. > > There have to be pros and cons I'm interested in. Can > > someone point them out? > same for me, but RT-LSM has been dropped by Andrew Morton in > the 2.6.12-mm kernels, so we should start using preemt. > Unfortunately, even for me RT-LSM gives much better results > than preemption. And even with the RT-LSM I get "only" > 16msecs latencies. Christoph, is there any reason you wouldn't use both preemption and rt-lsm at the same time? -- Eric Dantan Rzewnicki | Systems Administrator Technical Operations Division | Radio Free Asia 2025 M Street, NW | Washington, DC 20036 | 202-530-4900 CONFIDENTIAL COMMUNICATION This e-mail message is intended only for the use of the addressee and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. Any unauthorized dissemination, distribution, or copying is strictly prohibited. If you receive this transmission in error, please contact network@xxxxxxxx
