On Tue, 2005-07-12 at 12:57 -0700, Iain Duncan wrote: > > > > yeah, i got this as well ... hasn't seemed to have any noticeable > > effects, though. > > Huh? Does that mean the kernel image is built anyway? I was under the > impression that it meant it didn't finish compiling? Am I confused? If the error was in building a module that you don't use, then it would be harmless. This seems to be the case. Lee
