[linux-audio-dev] Re: [Jackit-devel] Re: [linux-audio-user][ANNOUNCE] jack_convolve-0.0.1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 21:22:02 -0600
"Reuben Martin" <MartinR@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> Forgive my ignorance, but is there any significant difference in the
> sound produced by this complex convolve and BruteFIR's half-complex
> convolve? (I'm speaking in a theoretical sense rather than comparing the
> actual implementations.)

There shouldn't be. There are however significant savings (approx 50%) in 
computation with the half complex version.

Erik
-- 
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
  Erik de Castro Lopo  nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Yes it's valid)
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
"I could never learn to use C++, because of the completely overwhelming
desire to redesign the language every time I tried to use it, but this
is the normal, healthy reaction to C++." -- Erik Naggum

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux