--- Florian Schmidt <mista.tapas@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 20:02:28 -0800 (PST) > R Parker <rtp405@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > I'm hesitant about returning to ext2 because I've > had > > fsck blow up in my face more than once...guess > that's > > why I rsync to a big IDE HD. I do expect ext2 > > performance to be perfectly acceptable. > > what's wrong with ext3? I haven't got any experience with it and want to use a file system that I know will read and write 16 to 24 tracks without any disk access errors. The person that suggested reiserfs to me had tested it and ext3 and thought reiserfs was the better of the two. This was six months ago and I talked about it with him again several days ago. Again no benchmark numbers to support any conclusions just the thoughts of a couple knuckleheads that are trying to do it. ron > flo > > -- > Palimm Palimm! > http://affenbande.org/~tapas/ > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
