Dave Phillips: >>The sources are to different. Ceres3 only supports mono-files and is >>very non-thread-safe. >> >Ceres3 will load L, R, or L+R stereo files. The problem is that ceres3 only shows/transforms one channel. ceres1 can handle up to 8 channels simultaniously. Thats a quite huge internal difference. > I can start sending you comments >regarding the major differences between Ceres and Ceres3 if you like. That would be great. I'm not so sure how much time I have to spend on Ceres right now. But such a list would at laset be nice to put into the documentation. >>?yvind Hammer has been working on Ceres in all years, the latest version >>(0.15) was released in 2001 if I remember correctly, before I took over. >>Even then, it compaired fairly to ceres3. So he never >>stopped the development of ceres, still other people released both >>ceres2, ceres2w and ceres3. I don't know why, perhaps they had good >reasons. >> >I had many email exchanges with Dr Hammer during that period. The other >versions had his blessings, he was I think too busy to add things like >WAV file support and stereo file support, and many bugs were not being >addressed. IIRC he was doing more work in paleontology. We occasionally Problem is that they shouldn't have been named ceres2/3, but instead something like ceres-newversion. Even here at notam, I sometimes see people use ceres3. I ask them why, and they say its because its the latest version. >Btw, thank you for all your excellent work in Linux audio software. I >don't know if many people realize how much you've contributed, but I do, >so thank you very much. :) Thank you very much. Same to you. :) --
