On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 09:57:56 +0100 Walco <walco-linux@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Atte Andr?, > > <snip> > > I'm still surprised to find that none of the sample editors I tried > > seems to support editing and saving of looppoints. This leads me to the > > following rant: Why would I need a bunch of editors (I have at least the > > following installed: audacity, rezound, gnusound, xwave, snd, kwave, > > gnoise, ecawave and sweep)???? I'd much rather have one that did it all, > > did it well and was stable and easy to upgrade (= is in the debian > > tree). This is of course due to the nature of OSS development: people > > start a new project because they miss something in the existing projects > > or simply because they like to code. > > <snip> > > > I realize that there's not a lot that can be don about it, just needed > > to get it off my chest :-) > > Well, the least you can do is vote for the loop-point editing in > audacity here: > > http://audacityteam.org/wiki/index.pl?FeatureRequests There are actually two sides to this problem: - the file I/O layer to add loop points - the GUI requirements to add loop points Many of the above mentioned sound file editors use libsndfile (audacity, sweep, mhWaveEdit, possibly others) which has just recently gained suport for reading loop points. If writing of loop points was also added you would be much closer to your goal. Erik -- +-----------------------------------------------------------+ Erik de Castro Lopo nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Yes it's valid) +-----------------------------------------------------------+ "I invented the term Object-Oriented, and I can tell you I did not have C++ in mind." -- Alan Kay
