On Thu, 17 Feb, 2005 at 12:30PM -0500, Lee Revell spake thus: > On Thu, 2005-02-17 at 17:13 +0000, james@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > On Thu, 17 Feb, 2005 at 02:32PM +0100, Esben Stien spake thus: > > > james@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes: > > > > > > > I've started a list for posting music made with Linux. > > > > > > I think this is a great idea, /me signs up. Only thing, I only > > > recognize linux as the kernel of the GNU system, so the name is just > > > adding to the confusion, in my opinion. > > > > Well, I did think about this. I know RMS would be spinning in his > > grave if he were dead. Thing is, it fit with LAD and LAU. Linux > > Audio Music doesn't even make much sense - it suggests that there's a > > possibility of non-audio music. > > > > Personally I think music made with Linux should just be posted on LAU. > No one ever said this was a "Linux audio tech" list. It's just "A list > for Linux audio users". I think LAU is great, and I certainly wouldn't unsubscribe just because there is another list with a smaller focus. I have found in the past, though, that "Look what I made!" posts get ignored. Or at least it looks like that. I'm sure people listen and have opinions, but don't actually take the time to write them down for everyone else to read. A place to post where you *know* people will give useful critisism will hopefully get more people to open up and put their creations in the public eye (ear?). It could also fail miserably and just be a silent ghost-town of a list. Whatever happens, trying it can't hurt. James > Lee > > -- "I'd crawl over an acre of 'Visual This++' and 'Integrated Development That' to get to gcc, Emacs, and gdb. Thank you." (By Vance Petree, Virginia Power)
