Mark Constable <markc@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Jack O'Quin wrote: > > ... > > Many kernel developers opposed this. It *is* something of a hack. > > But, no one has been able to come up with a better solution, and this > > one at least looks safe. I expect it to be replaced by something > > better in the 2.8 timeframe. > > Whoa... like in two or more years from now :-( That's why I am patiently working to get realtime-lsm merged soon. > Is there any extra reasonable lobbying the rest of us > could do ? Looks like things are going OK right now. No need to rock the boat unless something comes unglued again. > I tried the patches but my system fell over, probably > for other reasons (nvidia etc). I hope to try again rsn. > > FWIW the -mm2 patch would not apply over a Gentoo patched > kernel but a "normal" kernel, 2.6.10 + rc3 + mm2, would > not load the nvidia-kernel (amd64) Gentoo ebuilt module. Sorry to hear that. Thanks for trying. -- joq
