On Wed, 2005-12-28 at 17:45 +0100, COCHARD Yves wrote: > >what do you mean Mac emulation? if you are talking about PearPC > > > >Are you talking about qemu? > > > > > > Yes/No, I'm talking about PearPC. I just got the idea that it could be > easier to run vst plugin this way as I only heard stuff from wine... > (and the "difficulty" of installing it) But probably the running an > entire vst host in a mac's emulation would cost to much cpu usage. At > least if you want to have ardour, seq24, and some others working at the > same time... Could an other way be a kind of [fst+pearpc for the gui]. maybe i am missing something, but i think you're being really twisted here. running win32/x86 VST plugins on linux/x86 is one thing. but trying to run win32/x86 VST plugins on */ppc is something entirely different, and seems completely insane because you have to do not just OS API mapping, but processor emulation. if you want to run macos/ppc VST plugins on linux/ppc, you don't need WINE or PearPC for that. --p
