On Tuesday 20 December 2005 15:53, Brett McCoy wrote: > I. I. Ooisen wrote: > >>I doubt it's a KDE issue, either, since Rosegarden (the *other* > >> score editor) is also a KDE application. > > > > rosegarden is not a score editor and will *hopefully* never be. > > remember each tool has some specific purposes. score editing is not > > what rosegarden is supposed to do. > > You should tell the Rosegarden developers that because they make the > claim on the website that it is a score editor. :-) Granted, > Rosegarden is missing some stuff that NoteEdit probably has (multiple > voices per staff, easy insertion/deletion of measures), but > Rosegarden has always worked "out of the box" for me, which is why I > use it, whereas NoteEdit was problematic (see below). > > > i hate combos. and perhaps all gnu/linuxists should. :) > > > > rosegarden should deal best with the way music sounds, not with the > > way music looks. > > > >>I use Rosegarden extensively for score editing. > > > > have you tried noteedit? > > Yes, I have tried it. It kept crashing on me, and I had trouble > getting it to find my MIDI devices (the TSE3 library, I think, was > the issue, it was segfaulting on startup), and refused to import any > of my MIDI files. bad luck, maybe? :) maybe they fixed the bugs in the meantime? with the latest version, i didn't have any of those problems (i remember there were some with the way midis were imported, though) > It doesn't support Jack either, which is crucial > for the setup I am using for composing and recording. didn't know that :( however, my point was not that noteedit was perfect. my point was that we might want to... care about it, at least... promoting it may help it improve. > -- Brett __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
