I. I. Ooisen wrote: >> I'm not a good music reader nor writer,but when i need it Is >>faster for me to write by hand. >> >> > >why, do you write it in adobe? :D)) > > > > Sorry my english is too much poor to understand this,I mean paper and pencil :\ >>Last night I was playing with it and trying to >>find the way to have a "normal" view (for me) of the score.Im >>accustomed to the real book,and I like to write my scores in that >>way,simple melody line and chords over,each line divided in four >>bars,to have a clear preview of what I'm writing and reading,but >>have not succes.This is not the first time I find this issue,and >>probably the main cause,between others with no direct relationship >>with noteedit,that made me reject the use and more extensive test of >>the program. >> >> > >finale has a reputation for having (at least in its first versions) the >most idiotic, un-intuitive, and frustrating interface in the history of >software. believe me. > > I believe you,I don't know Finale. >don't compare noteedit with finale. > I didn't,I only name it in my post because here, http://rnvs.informatik.tu-chemnitz.de/~jan/noteedit/noteedit.html that is in the open post of this thread , is named as part of the reason of the discontinuation of the project. > they are conceived differently. >noteedit is more like "nwc" ("noteworthy composer") for windows, which >is a much friendlier design. > > Don't know nwc,neither.Does it have the feature to see the sheet as a "normal" paper,and not one line only? >just try noteworthy composer (for windows, not gpl), and you'll see what >i mean. then try NOTEEDIT. > > Ok, goin to be difficult presently as I don't use windows anymore,but if I got the chance,I will. Saludos --Carlos.
