On 08/12/05, Paul Davis <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > there is more going on there than almost nobody on this list except for > the LS authors and myself is aware of. it would be wise for everyone to > not judge this admittedly very unpleasant change in the license without > being aware of the reasons why it occured. unfortunately, it is not > possible to explain any more. Still, without explaining any more, would it be an idea for the authors to indicate what their likely response would be under some easily imaginable scenarios, like: "I'm about to release a commercial album where linux sampler was used in production. May I?" - Pete.
