On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 10:45:48 -0700 Noah Roberts <roberts.noah@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Why not just download the 2.6.13 tree and use it? Such is what I did. > Apparently many people here like to respond to messages/threads > without reading them. Hi, if we misunderstood, then i apologize, but let me quote you: "I could not find a realtime-preempt patch that will apply correctly to a recent 2.6.12 kernel. It could be that some combination of 2.6.12 and realtime-preempt-2.6.12-final will work but I decided to give up. All attempts resulted in rejected hunks, -R?, and/or missing files (which file to patch:). No compilable kernel ever resulted." This clearly means you applied the patch to the wrong kernel. > Whether it builds or is functional on AMD64 is THE issue. It isn't a > different issue...it is THE issue for this thread. It is also the > very issue of the post you are responding to. Well, apparently not after reading your above statement. > I get lambasted for trying to patch 2.6.13 and now I get lambasted for > saying you have to use a pre-current kernel if you want the RP with > amd64. I can't win with you people. I am not playing anymore. You > all need something better to do with your lives. I tried to help. If i made a mistake sorry, that can happen, but i don't have to take any shit from you. You need to get your attitude right. I won't filter you, as i think this is silly, but don't expect me to give any advice to you in the near future without an apology for above insult. Regards, Flo -- Palimm Palimm! http://tapas.affenbande.org
