Noah Roberts wrote: > On 8/22/05, tim hall <tech@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>More unsubstantiated comment, for which I apologise: >> >>On Monday 22 August 2005 06:54, Lee Revell wrote: >> >>>Try the latest RT preempt patch that works with 2.6.12. Or, why not >>>just use a prepackaged RT patched kernel like the Demudi one? >> >>I would guess that Noah has already tried it. There is enough traffic on the >>AGNULA-users list to suggest that none of the prepackaged DeMuDi 2.6 RT >>kernels are actually stable, they seem to work perfectly on some hardware and >>not on others (partic. low-spec and 64bit machines). > > > The 2.6.13 idea was probably the most helpful. Applying the rt patch > was an idea given by Revel, though not for .13...but thanks for > yelling at me about it anyway. .13 comes with the RT patch applied > already so it isn't necissary to apply any patch to this kernel....not > that I don't know how. have i missed something? i've been applying patches to the 2.6.13 kernel: > http://people.redhat.com/mingo/realtime-preempt/patch-2.6.13-rc6-rt12 is this not required anymore (makes me wonder what i actually did when patching that kernel then ...) ? shayne
