R Parker wrote: > > >>Anyway, I jumped all over David's proposal. The >>topic >>is a pet peve of mine and I'm on a personal mission. > > > I got distracted and didn't make my point clear. I > mean to say that what David is proposing is a common > opinion on the topic and so I'm not trying to jump > down his throat. If I ever have a mission beyound > trying to make it to the bathroom on time it is to > dispell the proposal that mastering is difficult. > > ron > Mastering to me comes from a long line of mystery! It should be the last 'clean up' of a virtually good mix, not the be all and end all of a long proccess. Anyone can re-mix a track, its all subjective, try it yourself, fire up XMMS and mess with the EQ, your re-mixing the tracks. Wether their better is subject to interpretation. mastering is only what you have been doing on the Multitrack, but using the stereo 2 track to control any dynamics you feel need to sit better. cheers Bob Rant over! > >>ron >> >> >>>I hope this helps. >>> >>>Regards, >>>Dave. >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>____________________________________________________ >>Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page >>http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs >> >> > > > > > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses. > http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail >
