Maybe just mention if it isn't. It could be assumed that music posted to this public list is creative commons. cheers Bob Leonard "paniq" Ritter wrote: >music released by me is generally released under the creative commons licence, >as stated on the homepage. > >i would assume that any music posted here is released under a creative commons >licence, but for clearity, it wouldnt hurt to explicitly mention it with the >post. > >On Sunday 07 August 2005 11:02, David Collins wrote: > > >>Just a suggestion: I think it would be useful if >>people specified what license they are releasing their >>compositions under when posting them to the list. >> >>I've come across some really nice tunes here, but it's >>unfortunate that sometimes we might not know the >>extent to which the author wants us to use/distribute >>them etc.. And granted, some people specify the >>licenses on their website, but others don't. >> >>Anyone else think this is a good idea? >> >>P.S. Maybe there's a specific policy already that I'm >>not aware of? >> >>-- >>http://hl.afraid.org/~david/ >>-- >> >>David Collins >> >>__________________________________________________ >>Do You Yahoo!? >>Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around >>http://mail.yahoo.com >> >> > > >
