Johannes Mario Ringheim: > > What about using this box: > http://www.museresearch.com/ > > Don't think I've seen it mentioned here, it's a box wich runs Windows > VSTs. You can also control its VSTs from a computer, by using a "UniWire > plugin", wich AFAIK is itself a VST on the computer. > > If one could run the UniWire instrument on GNU/Linux, as a LADSPA plugin > or even as a VST, wouldn't that make it possible to pretty much run all > the VSTs the Receptor can offer? > > Ehem, As a matter of fact, it has been mentioned a lot here. Last time by Paul Davies in this thread! ;-) This is one of the two hardware boxes that run vst-plugins using linux. The other one is called plugzilla (or plugzila, dont know the spelling). They both use wine. I'm not sure, but I doubt you can run that many more plugins using one of these boxes than using vstserver, dssi-vst or jack-fst, because all the systems depend on wine. So instead of buying one of these boxes, you could just set up an additional linux-box, it should do the same thing, but using your own linux-setup you get full control of whats happening, and you probably get more cpu-power as well. --
