On Monday 11 Apr 2005 23:19, Paul Davis wrote: > the problem is that there is no single answer. if you want to run 1 > or 3 VSTi's then i would agree with chris' assessment (for now, > anyway). but you cannot use this model to put a VST EQ on 12 tracks > and a VST delay unit on 2 others and a VST looper on another. the > architecture doesn't scale. The VST-per-server implementation might not, but there's no very compelling reason not to have multiple VSTs in a single server serving multiple clients. That would be less reliable than a dssi-vst type service can be, but no less reliable than fst, and it should scale nearly as well. It's been on my todo list for ages... Chris
