[linux-audio-user] preempt or low latency

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2005-04-07 at 10:10 -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-04-07 at 08:10 +0100, anahata wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 10:52:02PM -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
> >  
> > > Or just use 2.6.  2.6.11 OOTB has better latency than 2.4 with those
> > > patches.
> > > 
> > 
> > At last! Am I right in thinking that this is the first release of 2.6 of
> > which that's true? Time for an upgrade, as I see Debian's up to 2.6.11 now.
> 
> 2.6.12 should be out within a week or two.  And my tests with 2.6.12-rc1
> show it's even better than 2.6.11.  So if you're still on 2.4 you might
> want to wait.

OK, so using 2.6.12 provides better latencies that 2.4.x with pre-empt +
lowlatency patches?

Or do we still need to apply Ingo's patches to 2.6.12?

bye
John



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux