Michal Seta wrote: > > > I think the question to ask is: did Bach own his music? > What was the attitude towards music ownership in the Baroque era, > anyways? I am not quite sure, although recently I started looking at > these issues, but all I know is that a very common practice in those > days was to copy other composers' scores in order to learn the craft, > quote other composers, use similar compositional techniques/vocabulary > as the masters, quote folk song, plainsong, etc. > > It has been proven that many of the compositions that were attributed > to Bach, are not his, in fact. The famous Anna Magdalen Notebook > contains pieces that are now known to be not of his but simply > included in the collection which served as an 'instructional' book for > keyboard playing. > > Also, for over 20 years Bach 'composed' weekly music for the church he > was employed by. Not all of his music survived but it is also known > that he has 'recycled' his own music for that purpose. > > Did Bach actually pondered the idea of ownership of his own music? > I doubt it, since he make his pupils copy his scores. > I think "ownership" is a bit of a side issue; I don't think it's unreasonable, though, for a writer to think of the work she wrote as being in some way "hers", although we may legitimately discuss what rights that bond of authorship brings with it.(Worth googling for Kant on copyright, by the way). That said, what matters is how (and whether) musicians and other creative producers get paid. Bach was employed as a musician: he enjoyed the patronage of the Church and of various feudal rulers. The question we have to face up to is whether it will be possible to earn a living as a professional musician when all music is freely shared. Today's equivalents of the feudal rulers who sponsored Bach are the giant shoe and soft-drink corporations. I have a nightmare vision of a world where all professional music is sponsored and controlled by giant corporations, with the rest produced by amateurs in their time away from working as wage-slaves for the said giant corporations. Unfortunately I don't have an answer. I can tell you for free that the answer is not conventional DRM, nor does it involve suing your best customers. If anyone is willing to commission me, as a professional copyright consultant, I will write a suitably expensive report explaining the above lack-of-answer in considerable detail, using the proceeds to fund my record-buying habit. Now, though, back to coding my jukebox software - (I may even get round to releasing a GPL'd alpha soon...) -- Edward Barrow Copyright Consultant edward@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ***Important: see http://www.copyweb.co.uk/email.htm for important information about the legal status of this email
