OT: Re: [linux-audio-user] Re: Re: OTT

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2005-04-01 at 20:32 +0200, Arnold Krille wrote:
>   \|/
>   -0-
>   /|\
> 
> Here are some more:
> 
> On Friday 01 April 2005 12:58, tim hall wrote:
> > Last Friday 01 April 2005 02:01, Kjetil Svalastog Matheussen was like:
> > > Q: How many linux audio users does it take to change a light bulb?
> 
> Two users argue whether gtk/gnome- or qt/kde-lightbulbs look better, 
> accompanied by two or three developers argueing which of the systems is 
> better/easier/cleaner for programming and maintaining a lightbulb.
> Two more developers chip in here wether C++ is better than C or not for 
> bringing a bulb to function. After the fifth "OT" in the subject, one of the 
> old ones complains about missing the one and only language for lightbulbs: 
> Assambler.

One to explain that despite what the box says we don't support 24/96 yet
with that particular light bulb.

Lee


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux