On Fri, 01 Apr, 2005 at 08:44AM -0500, Dave Phillips spake thus: > Greetings: > > I routinely top-post in compliance with the wishes of blind members of > this and other lists. They use tts readers for their mail and do not > wish to re-read the original post. > > Best, > > dp > I tend to do this. If it's a short original message, I post at the bottom. If I want to address several points from the original, I interleave my post to give context. If it's a long post, I stick it at the top. That seems to suit most people. > > Mark Constable wrote: > > >On Friday 01 April 2005 20:11, mprims@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > > > >>>Please excuse top-posting. > >>> > >>> > >> ^^^^^^^ > >>This is the 2nd time in a few days I see this term used. > >>What does it mean? > >> > >> > > > >Enter "top vs bottom posting" into google. This reply, for > >instance, is bottom-posted. > > > > > > > > > > > -- "I'd crawl over an acre of 'Visual This++' and 'Integrated Development That' to get to gcc, Emacs, and gdb. Thank you." (By Vance Petree, Virginia Power)
