Eric Dantan Rzewnicki writes: > On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 10:36:54AM -0400, Janina Sajka wrote: > > I just want to tahnk everyone who has responded to Greg's post. > > Speaking as one for whom looking at output is simply not an option (I am > > blind), it's highly encouraging to read all the comments that support > > what does work in the non-graphical environment. My choices may be > > biologically based, but it's nice to learn that others find occasions to > > make the same choices on purely musical and functional grounds. > > hear, hear. Perhaps I'm making too much of a stink about it, but after > all, we are working with sound, not light. Well, and we're also working with bits and bytes at root. Everything else is artificially created. Still, it's fascinating to consider how we all bring the total being into the act of making music. For me that has meant learning to do more by listening rather than by reading scores, for example. Someone mentioned using the visual UI to organize and select the raw sonic materials for the final composition--the process of choosing among them. This is most certainly a very different thing when you do it all from meory. Even good file organizing strategies don't yield the same functionality--though they might come close, I suppose. > > -Eric Rz. -- Janina Sajka, Chair Accessibility Workgroup Free Standards Group (FSG) janina@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Phone: +1 202.494.7040
