On Friday 10 September 2004 04:25 pm, Lee Revell wrote: > On Fri, 2004-09-10 at 14:57, John Check wrote: > > On Thursday 09 September 2004 04:20 pm, Lee Revell wrote: > > > On Thu, 2004-09-09 at 14:24, David Baron wrote: > > > > On Thursday 09 September 2004 19:00, > > > > > > > > linux-audio-user-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > > > Go for it. i would definetly like to save the extra step of > > > > > compiling the realtime lsm each time i upgrade my kernel.. And i > > > > > think it might prove useful even for non audio users.. Often > > > > > security stuff likes to mlock small portions of memory, too, etc.. > > > > > > > > Yes, except that the realtime-lsm precompiled binary is not updated > > > > on Sid each time the kernel is. The only way to keep it current is to > > > > compile it yourself. Compiles quickly and reliably--just remember to > > > > copy the .ko to the correct place and then reboot. > > > > > > This is why we want realtime-lsm to be part of the kernel, because it > > > _would_ automatically get upgraded when you upgraded your kernel. > > > Since > > > > Are you sure? ALSA isn't always current. > > Exactly, but realtime-lsm has not changed in a long time, it's very > simple (~200 lines of code), has no known bugs, and many people find it > useful. So it's a perfect candidate to include in the kernel. > > I have already received an OK from the maintainer, as soon as I get a > patch from him I will be posting it to LKML. > Sweet! > Lee
