[linux-audio-user] Re: linux-audio-user Digest, Vol 8, Issue 43

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Message: 4
> Date: Sat, 15 May 2004 14:06:17 -0700
> From: Malcolm Baldridge <linux-audio@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [linux-audio-user] Inexpensive
> motherboards/chipsets for
> 	linux	audio
> To: A list for linux audio users
> <linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <1084655177.40a68649e8140@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
> 
> 
> > Does anyone have experience using an ECS N2U400-A
> or
> > ECS K7VTA3 motherboard for audio work? 
> 
> Let me guess, you're finding the recent
> CPU+motherboard offerings from Fry's
> to be tempting?

Nothing about that store is tempting.  Unfortunately
my lack of disposable income limits my options to the
least expensive equipment.

 
> Well, ECS motherboards are at the bottom of the
> barrel.  You might get
> something that works, you might get a noise factory,
> who knows?  

I have read conflicting reports re:  those boards for
general desktop usage, some say they are rubbish,
others say that they offer the best value.  I figured
I'd ask the list for some linux audio specific info.


> I know I
> found my ECS Pentium 4 motherboard to be barely
> adequate and that was just
> for a TELEPHONY logging application where I could
> tolerate a -65 dB noise
> floor. (OUCH)

I guess I should have mentioned that I am not building
a DAW for a home studio or anything.  I mentioned that
my current machine is a PIII-550 without room for any
significant upgrades.  It is more or less sufficient
for most of what I am doing (word processing,
telecommunicating, web development, etc.) but for the
bits of audio that I am doing it is a little slow. 
E.g., remastering field recordings with Jamin is a big
hassle and completely ties up the computer.  I am not
doing any 24 bit recording on this box or anything, no
analog signals being recorded at all really so RFI or
whatever causes the noisyness shouldn't be that
relevant (or should it?).

> The K7VTA3 is a VIA-chipset system with all of the
> usual vagaries and bugs
> implied thereto.  

Okay, so the VIA chipset is problematic re:  audio? 
Could someone who has experienced this briefly outline
the problem or maybe point me toward some
documentation?


> The N2U400 is an nVIDIA nForce chipset motherboard,
> which 
=== message truncated ===

[that's what I get for using my backup webmail
interface w/ lau in digest mode I guess]

So the upshot is that the nVIDIA chipset is
significantly better than the VIA board?  Because it
is also 40% more expensive as well.  But if it really
offers a better value then I might go for it.  Any
informed opinions?


Thanks,

Barton


	
		
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! - Internet access at a great low price.
http://promo.yahoo.com/sbc/

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux