On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 01:12:41 -0700, R Parker wrote: > Do you, or anyone else, have an informed opinion for > whether lookahead or hard is the most appropriate and > why? In all honesty, I don't know. JAMin is headed for > a 1.0 release and I think it would be interesting to > debate whether we're using the best limiter for the > job. Steve and I have briefly touched on this topic a > couple times. It could be that we're using the > appropriate limiter. I did a bit of reasearch at the time and it looked like all the respectable mastering packages use lookahead. Wether the implementation is the best for the job is another question. I suspect it should have a peak allowance mode, which ignores very short peaks at over 0dB and clips them. - Steve
