Hi, onsdagen den 24 mars 2004 17.12 skrev tim hall: > On Wednesday 24 March 2004 7:44 am, James Stone wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 12:49:50AM +0000, tim hall wrote: > > > On Wednesday 24 March 2004 12:04 am, antoine rivoire wrote: > > > > a simple stupid question: in muse the tempo is in percentage? > > > > or is 100 really 100 bpm? what is the rationale here? > > > > > > It's BPM. > > > > No its not (AFAIK). > > > > When you start Muse, the default is 100%, 120 bpm. > > Right, I was slightly off-beam. > You set the tempo using Edit>Mastertrack>... (in bpm) - ignore this %tempo > widget. > I guess that the rationale for this control is for when you want to record > something at half speed or whatever, without altering the Master track's > bpm settings. The default is 120bpm and this tempo fine-tune is obviously > set to 100%. The documentation for MusE is virtually non-existent, Thanks to Joachim Schiele MusE does now have a Wiki, and we are already preparing some content for it. Hopefully we will have prepared some more useful documentation in the near future. Interested people are quite welcome to add content! :) > what is > not obvious is that this very prominent widget is not designed for setting > the tempo - It's for altering the tempo in % steps. Hope that makes sense. > > > What does muse -R do? > > Runs it in realtime, if you're not connected via Jackd. Right. MusE does not run /well/ if it does not have access to rtc and realtime capabilities. Timing will be off. > Maybe I'm kludging a bit, I'm still using 0.6.1, which doesn't work well > with Jackd. (Help not required, I know why). I'm looking forward to > upgrading. You should definitively upgrade, 0.6.3 is heaps better than 0.6.1 at audio and jack. > I'm a little wary of rolling my own, but MusE will be a likely > candidate if I decide to bite the bullet. You mean that there are none available for your system? Not that it's that difficult to build MusE. Autoconf is always a problem though... :-/ Regards, Robert
