[linux-audio-user] Re: Sample Rates/Sample Sizes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Anahata wrote:
> But what about effects such as stochastic resonance?
> Add  a (miniscule) amount of distortion and we hear
> more of the music.

> This seems to suggest the possibility of the
recording of
> an acoustic
> performance of music sounding "better" than being
present at the performance itself.

> I see thin ice here!

Not what I'm saying really. "Better" would imply a
euphonic aspect and I'm just talking about the
information content. There's also no reason why the
low-level noise could not be added to a performance
e.g. by the rustling of clothing ;-)

I'm not an expert on this stuff but it's been proven
that stochastic resonance does increase the
information  content of non-linear systems (Google for
it, there's lots of material). One question that does
arise, however, is if this added information falls
below the noise floor of the reproduction system in
use.

Greg






	
	
		
___________________________________________________________ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - sooooo many all-new ways to express yourself http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux