[linux-audio-user] Pros/Cons of the Delta 1010LT?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2004-06-21 at 14:20, Jason MacDermott wrote:
> I was looking at one of the RME cards to use under Linux (Ardour, etc.)
> because of its ADAT ins/outs, and since I have an ADAT machine hooked up to
> my mixer.
> However, since the Delta 1010LT is significantly cheaper, has lots of
> Ins/Outs (albeit RCAs) and SPIDIF connections, I am now considering this
> route.  Can anyone give me any thoughts on it?  I am far from a pro, but of
> course I want something I will be able to live with for a number of years.

Those are _very_ different cards. If anything, i'd compare the RME
(probably Multiface) with the 1010 proper, not with the el cheapo
1010LT. Even then the cards are still quite different.
And the LT is not even balanced.

I suspect you probably don't need the RME if you look favourably upon
the 1010LT. If that's true, then it's simple: you need balanced analog?
then get the 1010. you don't need balanced? then get the 1010LT.

-- 
Florin Andrei

http://florin.myip.org/


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux