On Sat, 2004-06-19 at 14:26, Lee Revell wrote: > RickTaylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > > > Have you actually worked with 24/96? > > > > I must admit I have not. But I don't need to try satellite internet to > know that it's unusable either, I know what the speed of light is and I > can do the math. > Yes, but even physiologists don't completely understand how hearing works. Nyquist doesn't appear to be the answer to everything. Read the latest issue of TapeOp and especially the interview with Walter Sear. I tend to record at 24/44.1 but that's just because 16/44.1 is my target and I don't use much in the way of effects. I also hear a difference though when I record 24/44.1 and 24/96. Jan
