> Meh, I can't tell the difference. I've yet to hear a compelling > argument for preferring anything more than 16bit/44.1k. Personal > opinions abound, but the plural of "anecdote" is not "data." I swear I can hear the difference between 16bit/44.1k and 16bit/48k. When I decided to use the extra 3.9K that my card allows, I did a "side by side test" of a 44.1K and 48K. The difference is quality is enough for me to record at a standard 48K rate. While we're on the subject. I noticed that a some of the sound font files that I've looked at have 33K audio files. Anyone know why this perticular sampling rate? I'm not being really diligent and going thru all my sound font files. I'm going from memory, and it seems I've seen this sampling rate in several sound fonts. Rocco
