On Sat, 2004-07-31 at 12:30, Chris Pickett wrote: > Florin Andrei wrote: > > > > http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-list/2004-July/thread.html#00071 > > > > Am i crazy? Am i the only one who thinks that the current incarnation of > > gnome-terminal is slow and a resource hog? > > No. I recently tried just about every terminal I could get my hands on, > and settled on using aterm like this: > > aterm -bg black -fg white +sb -tr -sh 15 -sl 10000 -si -sk -fn 8x13 -ls > -geometry 80x36 Nice. But it seems focused on "cute" features such as transparent background and such. http://aterm.sourceforge.net/ Are you sure it's the fastest, leanest one? > and I have room for four of them at once not overlapping. Ahhh... I fondly remember the days when i could do that with gnome-terminal. For some obscure reason, no matter how much i tweak it, i can't get it nowadays to occupy exactly 1/4 of my screen (with two 24 pix control panels on top and at the bottom of the screen). -- Florin Andrei http://florin.myip.org/
