On Friday 30 July 2004 05:38 am, Dave Griffiths wrote: > On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 23:29:04 -0400, Rob wrote > -snip- > > FWIW this ladspa only softsynth is something I've been itching to do for > ages, I think it's a really good idea. Maybe it would require some > specialist LADSPA plugins that would be needed for a softsynth, but I think > this is where the functionality belongs, rather than in client code. [screeching tires] Where can I find out more about this? What's it called? > > After my recent experiments I'd recommend leaving the GUI out of the > picture for as long as possible, and implementing it in a scripting > language instead of C++ - I find it a much more productive way of > developing, plus your software is availible for people who don't want or > can't use GUIs with no extra work. > > cheers, > > dave
