fre 2004-07-30 klockan 20.29 skrev Dave Robillard: > On Fri, 2004-07-30 at 12:56, Steve Harris wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 12:50:28PM -0400, Dave Robillard wrote: > > > I really (really) would like to have a sample module too, but you can't > > > do it with LADSPA, and I'm VERY hesitant to introduce another > > > program-specific module format (ala SSM, ams, etc.) The duplication of > > > effort there is awful. > > > > > > I think maybe DSSI can provide this, but I'm not sure. It's definitely > > > on the agenda though, I'm looking in to it. I'd like the ability to > > > create drum synths, with sampled waveforms as well as synthesized (so > > > you could run a waveform through a filter controller by an envelope etc. > > > etc.). You could do it now by running say, specimen into a modular > > > synth, but that's just a nuisance. > > > > Yes, DSSI can handle samplers - fluidsynth has been wrapped as a DSSI > > plugin I think. > > > > - Steve > > This I like. Is there any reason not to create DSSI modules with no > MIDI support? > > I really think that's something you should support if not. I would > really like to use DSSI as super-LADSPA, "soft synth" be damned. A > sampler plugin would be #1 on my list. > > -DR- If linuxsampler provides the same gui/engine separation as fluidsynth does it wouldn't be difficult to wrap it up with M.E.S.S or DSSI and throw it into MusE or RG, together with a bank of good drumsamples and some preconfigured "drumkits". Not to mention all the other fun things you would be able to do... I don't know much about linuxsampler though, does anyone know how it will work with LADSPA-fx, routing and midi? Will it provide send-fx that could be controlled via midi, for different channels etc etc or? Hmm, better check the archives... /Mathias
