On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 06:19:21PM -0700, Florin Andrei wrote: > > I didn't A/B them, but i did listen to them at different times. And i > could easily compare both to the SR125 since that's the Grado that i > own. So my comparison might be unreliable, but it matches what other > people say. > > The SR80 are more lively. Is that good or bad? I think the overall opinion is that Grado phones are already a little trigger happy ;) > > except for the "holes" > > in the can covers... I'm not sure how that would feel compared to the > > SR60's solid covers. > > I'm not certain i understand what do you mean by that. The SR60 that i > saw had similar cans to the SR80, as you can see on the gradolabs.com > site. Hmm, on the site, they seem to have either a wrong picture for the SR60, or are using different covers than on my two pairs. On mine, the part that contacts the ear is just a flat round foam cover. On the picture of both the SR60 and the SR80 on their site, there is a "donut" or "cup" that surrounds the ear, which is very different from the SR60 that I have. -- Ryan Underwood, <nemesis@xxxxxxxxxxxx> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature Url : http://music.columbia.edu/pipermail/linux-audio-user/attachments/20040722/46088aee/attachment.bin
